RailRoadFan.com

DR wrote:GP9r!!!!! I've been wanting someone to do a model of this for years!

We have a DR sighting fellas

DR?!??!?!?!? Where!??!!? I DONT SEE HIM!!!!
Oh.....wait....HERE I AM!!!!!!

GP9r: Who said a pirate couldnt have a locomotive!

Welp, the vote is in. The GP9R is the next project up. Got the parts in the mail today that i've been waiting for. Should start building in the "shops" on Tuesday.

Chris

OaklandCountyCustoms wrote:Welp, the vote is in. The GP9R is the next project up. Got the parts in the mail today that i've been waiting for. Should start building in the "shops" on Tuesday.

Chris

I think the challenge will vbe the undercarriage. It's part GP9/35/38. Above the frame it's essentially a GP9 p3 long hood and GP38 cab/short hood.

Looking forward to your model

Funny this thread came up, as I just found mine I had been working on before we moved to Toledo, hummm six years in the making is that some kind of record? Suppried me as I had most of it done. It will probly be another six years before I get it done though.

Going to be a combination athearn/front range/canon and company unit. Before anyone has the chance to critique... this unit will have the wrong number and sized fans, improper louver number and configuration on the body and probably some other details will be amiss. The client ordering could not find correct pieces for me to assemble and i havent decided whether i'm going to sand everything down or not. just be forwarned

OaklandCountyCustoms wrote:Going to be a combination athearn/front range/canon and company unit. Before anyone has the chance to critique... this unit will have the wrong number and sized fans, improper louver number and configuration on the body and probably some other details will be amiss. The client ordering could not find correct pieces for me to assemble and i havent decided whether i'm going to sand everything down or not. just be forwarned

You can only work with what the customer provides. But, I'm surprised because at least above the frame it would only take the GP38 cab & short hood and the GP9 p3 (which is currently in production or was not long ago) long hood.

Below the frame IMO represents the biggest challenge.

Still look forward to seeing what you come up with

I really dont know what you think is so hard about below the frame? I have spent many hours looking at photos before I started mine, and a (at the time) Proto 2000 GP18 body matched just fine, along with the underframe. Maybe a little work, I need to get it out and go over photos again. IIRC the GP9 PH3 and GP18 were esentualy the same body.

Yeah, i have no plans to tinker with the under frame at all. Proto is nice, but i hate how they are factory assembled...terrible for taking apart and customizing. Note to maufacturers...stop gluing things together! thanks

I don't have a GP18 handy, how is the fuel tank/air tanks on the P2K? The GTW GP9R's had a larger fuel tank and the air tanks under the walkway, like later EMD's (I think they started on the GP20's). Perhaps using a GP20 frame would work? A stock GP7/9 and I think GP18 from EMD had the air tanks mounted under the frame, between the fuel tank and rear truck (assuming short hood is the front)

csxt4617 wrote:I don't have a GP18 handy, how is the fuel tank/air tanks on the P2K? The GTW GP9R's had a larger fuel tank and the air tanks under the walkway, like later EMD's (I think they started on the GP20's). Perhaps using a GP20 frame would work? A stock GP7/9 and I think GP18 from EMD had the air tanks mounted under the frame, between the fuel tank and rear truck (assuming short hood is the front)

You are right about the air tanks and fuel tank. Those will be left alone on this go around. Perhaps on my next go at it i'll go even more extreme with cutting things apart.

Here is where i am so far... i have trimmed off the old short hood and walkways and built the canon cab. They are not attached at this point but just set up for example. there are still holes where the walkways used to be that need to be patched with styrene. Project for another day.

Ya know you are right, but as you say that I realise why I did not think of what Don was talking about. I already did it to the model.

updates today. paint finished. decals, weathering and final assembly after x-mas.



chris

Did the GP9r's have 4 exhaust stacks rather than 2? I always thought it was 2 but I've seen a few pictures at odd angles where it looked like 4.

I looked thru all my pics of them, and granted none were overhead views, they ones I had all looked like 2, unless the other 2 stacks were flush with the roofline.

AARR wrote:Did the GP9r's have 4 exhaust stacks rather than 2? I always thought it was 2 but I've seen a few pictures at odd angles where it looked like 4.

All the GP9rs had two fans. I believe OaklandCountyCustoms said that the fans would be incorrect because his client did not get the proper parts.

GTWChris wrote:

AARR wrote:Did the GP9r's have 4 exhaust stacks rather than 2? I always thought it was 2 but I've seen a few pictures at odd angles where it looked like 4.

All the GP9rs had two fans. I believe OaklandCountyCustoms said that the fans would be incorrect because his client did not get the proper parts.

I was referring to the exhaust stacks between the fans

Yeah, from all the research i was ever able to do they only had 2 stacks. The SEMTA units had 4.

Chris

When rebuilt at Battle Creek all the 4600's had there original long hoods with just 2 standard EMD exhaust stacks, with 48" fans, a couple have gone through the Woodcrest shops on the IC and they desecrated at least one that I know of with 4 exhaust stacks kinda like the MoPac did, don't know what it was with the MoPac and IC but they loved those 4 stacks?
All the GTW GP38-2's that were former MoPac units the original 5700's on the GTW had 4 stacks as well but when Battle Creek got them they plugged the 2 and went with stock exhaust manifolds.

Thanks for the info GTWHogger.

Chris - How are you doing on this project?