![Image](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4152/4831708473_ac478b434f.jpg)
![Image](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4107/4831709167_ae2939239d.jpg)
![Image](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4132/4831709497_07ab40459c.jpg)
![Image](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4106/4832319500_ef76f8a807.jpg)
![Image](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4132/4831711379_50c4f76819.jpg)
What does JM receive in covered hoppers?redside20 wrote:also nice pics of the local switching out Johns Manville
If this is an insulation plant, I'm guessing silica sand, which is melted down to make fiberglass. If it's not sand, than it is probably limestone or soda ash, which are mixed with the silica to lower the melt temp. It could also be recycled glass, but I doubt that would be shipped by rail. If insulation is made here, I just spent a week at work installing their product, If they don't make insulation here, than I have no idea.AARR wrote:What does JM receive in covered hoppers?
Good info...thanks shorthaulShorthaul wrote:If this is an insulation plant, I'm guessing silica sand, which is melted down to make fiberglass. If it's not sand, than it is probably limestone or soda ash, which are mixed with the silica to lower the melt temp. It could also be recycled glass, but I doubt that would be shipped by rail. If insulation is made here, I just spent a week at work installing their product, If they don't make insulation here, than I have no idea.AARR wrote:What does JM receive in covered hoppers?
Judging by the condition of the rest of their infrastructure, I would be quite frightened to be that close to that bridge, although it might be the one thing that is required to be kept up to a rational state of repair. Would it really be too much for the MAW to rent a tamper for a few days? Although with the condition of what they call "ballast", the tamper might make it worse, not to mention break joints and cause other problems when it is lining. It would probably move the rails, but not the ties. Scary for a revenue freight railroad.AARR wrote:Nice pictures Brent. Although I'm biased toward pictures with industries in them I like the one of the engine on the bridge.
Shorthaul wrote:Judging by the condition of the rest of their infrastructure, I would be quite frightened to be that close to that bridge, although it might be the one thing that is required to be kept up to a rational state of repair.AARR wrote:Nice pictures Brent. Although I'm biased toward pictures with industries in them I like the one of the engine on the bridge.
MagnumForce wrote:They would throw three guys in this 87 Ranger, one of them the conductor, and coax rails into place etc as the train goes by, it is such a jacked up operation.
Well, the ballast has little to do with anything other than drainage and making sure the ties stay where they need to be. If anything, a tamper would destroy any structural support the rotting ties currently give the track. If the ties are no good, it does more damage then just leaving it lay. They'd be better off buying new ties, and just getting a weed spraying outfit in. Not that they can afford either. That outfit looks like one major derailment away from being out of business.Shorthaul wrote:Would it really be too much for the MAW to rent a tamper for a few days? Although with the condition of what they call "ballast", the tamper might make it worse, not to mention break joints and cause other problems when it is lining. It would probably move the rails, but not the ties. Scary for a revenue freight railroad.
They keep buying used ties from CSX (I don't even know if they buy them...CSX might just give them to them!) and placing those in.CSX_CO wrote:Well, the ballast has little to do with anything other than drainage and making sure the ties stay where they need to be. If anything, a tamper would destroy any structural support the rotting ties currently give the track. If the ties are no good, it does more damage then just leaving it lay. They'd be better off buying new ties, and just getting a weed spraying outfit in. Not that they can afford either. That outfit looks like one major derailment away from being out of business.
They need a sign at FC where the diamonds go 'up and over' the B&O that says "Highest point on the MAW".
Practice Safe CSX
The SMRS (Southern Michigan Railroad) has a weed sprayer mounted on a speeder cart, and operates on zero freight revenue, so it's hard to believe that these guys can't afford a weed sprayer. The issue is that the whole track structure starts sinking into the ground due to a lack of ballast, and if there are no weeds on embankments, than the dirt washes away in the rain and the track sinks more. Another problem on the SMRS is that the line was built without tie plates, so the rail is cutting through the ties. I can't imagine how this line (the MAW) is going to survive for more than a decade without MAJOR investment.CSX_CO wrote: They'd be better off buying new ties, and just getting a weed spraying outfit in. Not that they can afford either.
Practice Safe CSX
Take a look at the right of ways of old, under steam locomotives. Absolutely no weeds, brush, or undergrowth along the sides of the ROW. The cinders out of the locomotives used to choke out any foilage that happened along the sides of the ROW. You don't see issues with dirt washing away there.Shorthaul wrote:The SMRS (Southern Michigan Railroad) has a weed sprayer mounted on a speeder cart, and operates on zero freight revenue, so it's hard to believe that these guys can't afford a weed sprayer. The issue is that the whole track structure starts sinking into the ground due to a lack of ballast, and if there are no weeds on embankments, than the dirt washes away in the rain and the track sinks more. Another problem on the SMRS is that the line was built without tie plates, so the rail is cutting through the ties. I can't imagine how this line (the MAW) is going to survive for more than a decade without MAJOR investment.CSX_CO wrote: They'd be better off buying new ties, and just getting a weed spraying outfit in. Not that they can afford either.
Practice Safe CSX
When BNSF laid the 2nd main on their transcon, much (if not all) was underlaid with asphalt. This served two purposes. One was that it created an access road for all the pre-track laying work (signals, engineering, etc) and the second being it served as a barrier to the mud problem.Shorthaul wrote:Thanks for this information CSX_CO. I wasn't aware of how common the HMA (Hot Mix Asphalt) underlayment was, I assumed it was a geotextile or geogrid in most situations, and the HMA was only for the worst of soils.