Super long CN trains.

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Ohio.
User avatar
railohio
Photographer of Wires in America by Rail of Ohio & Wisconsin
Posts: 1789
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by railohio »

Standard Railfan wrote:
railohio wrote:
Toppysager wrote:CSX manifest
Bad example. Outside of intermodal, articulated freight cars are rare.
The DMIR, LSI,and BNSF have in the past run 3 or 4 ore jennies semi-permanently coupled together with drawbars.
Out of more than 1.3 million freight cars in service in he U.S. in 2010, they would still be considered rare.
"I shot the freight train / But I did not shoot the fantrip"

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by JStryker722 »

1=3 truck loads
1.3 million freight cars replace 3.9 million trucks or more at any one time
1.3 million freight cars=articulated cars still rare lol

Just thought I'd sum the argument in a goofy way lol

Anyway back to the CN trains,huh?

(Sorry for repeating you RailOhio)
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1816
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

railohio wrote:Out of more than 1.3 million freight cars in service in he U.S. in 2010, they would still be considered rare.
Unless you are standing in the CN Ore yard in Two Harbors MN where there is nothing to see but ore cars. :lol:

User avatar
railohio
Photographer of Wires in America by Rail of Ohio & Wisconsin
Posts: 1789
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by railohio »

But we're actually talking about the probably of seeing articulated cars in a CSX manifest in Marion, Ohio, as was mentioned in the thread.
"I shot the freight train / But I did not shoot the fantrip"

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Saturnalia »

CSX_CO wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:I have logged a 162-car NS Intermodal Train at Porter, and of course the 189-car monster mighty Marquette manifest they barged home from Grand Rapids.
Are you counting tubs/hitches or actual couplers? Big difference between the two.
I count each "tub" as a "car". It is more accurate to count that way than counting 3 and 5 tub sets of wells/pigs, at least from the railfan perspecitve.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
MagnumForce
Angry Man
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Tri State Area

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by MagnumForce »

Those are platforms not cars

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4142
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by CAT345C »

There are old coal gons in scrap service that are draw bared in sets of 2s. If it is stuck together and has one car number it's one car end of story.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Saturnalia »

CAT345C wrote:There are old coal gons in scrap service that are draw bared in sets of 2s. If it is stuck together and has one car number it's one car end of story.
I think we all get that, some of us are just trying to say we count articulated by the piece for railfan counting purposes.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

If we're talking "super long trains" why are we even talking about articulated cars or number of cars? Does it matter? It's the length of the train that matters. When I get on my train, I really don't give two sh!ts about how many cars it is or if I have any articulated equipment. I look at the length and tonnage and the makeup. You could say, "I saw a 200 car train!!!!11!!!1 WOW!!!1!!!11!" Okay, well what if they're all 42-foot 2-bay hoppers? Including a 3-unit consist, that's not even 8700 feet long. Which is still big, but not really the kind of big we are talking about here. A manifest train with 200 cars, averaging 60 feet per car, is a different story...now over 12,000 feet with a 3-unit consist.

Typhoon
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1188
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:16 pm
Location: Under a palm tree

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Typhoon »

MQT3001 wrote:
CAT345C wrote:There are old coal gons in scrap service that are draw bared in sets of 2s. If it is stuck together and has one car number it's one car end of story.
I think we all get that, some of us are just trying to say we count articulated by the piece for railfan counting purposes.
Why would a railfan want to use a different way to count cars?

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Typhoon wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:
CAT345C wrote:There are old coal gons in scrap service that are draw bared in sets of 2s. If it is stuck together and has one car number it's one car end of story.
I think we all get that, some of us are just trying to say we count articulated by the piece for railfan counting purposes.
Why would a railfan want to use a different way to count cars?
It is more accurate for train length. A 100-car intermodal train counted tub-by-tub is more or less equal to a 100-car manifest. But is the 100-"car" intermodal train was counted literally car-by-car, then it would be only 20 cars if they were all 5-piece sets. It is just a better estimate of overall length when a figure from say a Defect Detector is not available. Also, it takes out the variability of having some cars of 1, some of 3, and some of 5 tubs each. Again, it gives a better estimate of overall train length.

This isn't to say I'm ignorant of the way railroads count the cars, which of course generally counts draw-bared cars as one. I just prefer to measure trains in the above way for the above reason.
Last edited by Saturnalia on Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5593
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Y@ »

Jesus on a freaking bike...
Bottom text.

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

On UP at least, it doesn't necessarily count "drawbars as one". Most 3 or 5-pack wells, even though they all share the same reporting marks, are counted singularly. Each tub is assigned a letter, with "A" and "B" being on either end in regular boxcar fashion, having an A-end and B-end (handbrake is on the B-end on boxcar, but on both ends of an intermodal set). So it would be A-C-B for a 3-pack or A-C-D-E-B for a 5-pack. For an articulated tub set, my list will not actually show "DTTX 723510". It will say DTTA 723510, DTTC 723510, DTTB 723510 with the containers listed on their respective tub and it counts it as THREE cars.

Articulated spine cars are counted as ONE car, so a 5-pack spine will actually show up as TTAX 653647 on my list, followed by the containers/trailers that are on it. There is no TTAA, TTAB, TTAC, etc. for spines as far as paperwork goes, though you would still classify them as such in identifying them.

Here is a breakdown of ZMQG4 17 for example:

6 5-pack spines
7 single tubs
11 3-pack tubs

The "short count" of this train is "46" cars. Not "24" as many young foamites may want to believe. The 6 5-pack spines are counted as 6 cars and not 30, whereas the 11 3-pack tubs are counted individually as 33 cars, not 11 as they would be if they were spines. The "long count", counting each unit individually is 70 cars.

Not as simple as many apparently think. At least on UP...I don't know how other railroads do it...

No, you don't know everything...

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38457
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by AARR »

Mr. Tops wrote:The "short count" of this train is "46" cars. Not "24" as many young foamites may want to believe. The 6 5-pack spines are counted as 6 cars and not 30, whereas the 11 3-pack tubs are counted individually as 33 cars, not 11 as they would be if they were spines. The "long count", counting each unit individually is 70 cars.
"Short Count" and "Long Count" are the terms I was trying to remember. Thanks for explanation, Tops.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Why do spines count differently than wells? :?
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

MQT3001 wrote:Why do spines count differently than wells? :?
You mean...you don't know?? :? :?

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Mr. Tops wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:Why do spines count differently than wells? :?
You mean...you don't know?? :? :?
Yeah, I don't know...why aren't they counted like Wells?
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
StupidFlee​t
Chinese Foooood
Posts: 697
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:38 pm
Location: Deshler
Contact:

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by StupidFlee​t »

Mr. Tops wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:Why do spines count differently than wells? :?
You mean...you don't know?? :? :?

+1
Flickr

(23:10:05) MagnumForce: All precautions were taken

User avatar
MagnumForce
Angry Man
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Tri State Area

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by MagnumForce »

Can I say "plattforms vs cars" again?

midland sub
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:10 pm

Re: Super long CN trains.

Unread post by midland sub »

Ever seen a double stacked spine car MQT...?

Locked