GLC 395, 396, 399

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by A No.1 »

These new GLC engines,

Are EMD GP38-2's?


Any one know?

Where are they getting shipped from?
Mark it Zero.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38437
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by AARR »

GP38-2's
Rebuilt in Pudach?
Ex-leasing co.
Exx-UP
Nee-MP (built 1973ish)
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.
Contact:

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by GLC 392 »

They are GP38-2's ex-UP's i believe. They are coming from Puducah KY from the ex-VMV shops which is now NRE.

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

That reminds me...I saw them (2 of them, I think) coming north around Kanakee on CNIC on my way up to MI for the holidays on 12-23 around 1600. Here's an awesome cell phone grab shot of 395 while driving north on I-57. My photography skills are digressing...

Image

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38437
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by AARR »

And the truck has a similiar color scheme as GLC unit. You couldn't have set that up better than what you caught by chance on the fly :) I think it's a great pic.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
¶aragraph
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by ¶aragraph »

GLC395 battle creek at 1:51am 12/25
GLC396 battle Creek at 23:40 12/23
glc 397 at Paducah KY 12/20
glc 398 Fulton KY on 12/22
GLC 399 battle creek at 1:51am 12/25

A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by A No.1 »

I did't Know abut 397 or 98

Here's 396 Yesterday.

Image
Mark it Zero.

A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by A No.1 »

Here is one more from Christmas Eve.



http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 505&nseq=0


Thank you for the info guys.
Mark it Zero.

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5593
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Y@ »

Mr. Tops wrote:That reminds me...I saw them (2 of them, I think) coming north around Kanakee on CNIC on my way up to MI for the holidays on 12-23 around 1600. Here's an awesome cell phone grab shot of 395 while driving north on I-57. My photography skills are digressing...

Image
Now that's truly an inspirational photo. Thank you Bob, PCA vote on RP from me!!!
Bottom text.

A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by A No.1 »

Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.

BTW, This is GLC 395 & 399.

Image
Last edited by A No.1 on Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mark it Zero.

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11413
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by J T »

JUST AARON wrote:Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.
Are there some buildings missing in the background? Something about that angle looks odd to me.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

Buster Manning
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Buster Manning »

The transload doesn't seem to transload anymore........or were you referring to the roundhouse that used to sit in the background from WAAAYYYYY back??

A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by A No.1 »

J T wrote:
JUST AARON wrote:Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.
Are there some buildings missing in the background? Something about that angle looks odd to me.
The shot I usually take looks off the bridge to the South West. This was shot looking to the South East. Right into the sun if the clouds were not there. The Peoples LLC grain Co op is directly to camera right. They still use the grain elevator, But not with trains.
Mark it Zero.

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11413
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by J T »

Yeah, I've taken a pic in that direction before. It just seems like there should be more buildings or something in the background. Maybe I'm imagining something else.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

DLM
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by DLM »

Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?

jukeman45
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:15 am

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by jukeman45 »

JUST AARON wrote:Here is one more from Christmas Eve.



http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 505&nseq=0


Thank you for the info guys.
Is the last CN unit in that row one of the former BNSF units?

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

DLM wrote:Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?
Typical 2600 gallon tank for a GP38-2. A 3600 gallon tank would completely fill the space between the trucks. Some railroads opted for the 2600 gal, others opted for the 3600 gal...the same goes for GP40-2s. So, to answer your question, no it is not smaller than normal. You may just be used to seeing a 2600 gallon tank on a 56 ft GP35, while the 2600 gal tank on a 59 ft GP38-2 tends to look smaller, although its actually the same size, but the locomotive is longer.

And yes...that is CN 2141 4th back, ex-BNSF C40-8W...

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38437
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by AARR »

Mr. Tops wrote:
DLM wrote:Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?
Typical 2600 gallon tank for a GP38-2. A 3600 gallon tank would completely fill the space between the trucks. Some railroads opted for the 2600 gal, others opted for the 3600 gal...the same goes for GP40-2s. So, to answer your question, no it is not smaller than normal. You may just be used to seeing a 2600 gallon tank on a 56 ft GP35, while the 2600 gal tank on a 59 ft GP38-2 tends to look smaller, although its actually the same size, but the locomotive is longer.

And yes...that is CN 2141 4th back, ex-BNSF C40-8W...
I've also seen a few 38's and 39's with smaller tanks than the 2600 gal.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

AARR wrote:I've also seen a few 38's and 39's with smaller tanks than the 2600 gal.
http://www.trainweb.org/csxphotos/photo ... SX-yn3.jpg

CSX GP38-2s 2556-2559 (ex-Durham & Southern) had 1700 gallon tanks. 56, 58 and 59 still have them, while 2557 now has a 3600 gallon tank. Other smaller railroads are similar.

Raildudes dad
Roadmaster
Posts: 4757
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Unread post by Raildudes dad »

I wouldn't want to pay for a "fillup" on any of them :lol:

Post Reply