NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
conrail767596
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:01 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by conrail767596 »

They signed an agreement of transfer; however, the actual transfer of ownership has not
yet taken place. Amtrak work gangs are not permitted to do their work as of this time,
since NS still holds ownership.

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by ns8401 »

There won't be any interchange between the AA and the GDLK via AA any time soon, the interchange needs major work to handle any trains let alone through freights.
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

User avatar
Racer
Stops in Oncoming Traffic
Posts: 4365
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Racer »

ns8401 wrote:There won't be any interchange between the AA and the GDLK via AA any time soon, the interchange needs major work to handle any trains let alone through freights.
Also, the interchange is a VERY steep grade (Gotta be atleast 4% maybe?) and goes through a very narrow right-of-way of woods and across Main Street (A 4-lane highway) with minimal visibility from the trees and the AA bridge. The tracks are still in place and the switches both on NS and AA's side are still in-tact (according to Bing Maps), but the tracks have trees growing between the rails, rails are missing in some segments, and Main Street is mostly paved over the rails.

The grade could be very challenging (and somewhat dangerous) to run an actual through-freight off that interchange track. A large train taking the grade north of Huron Street, then to make that steep, curved drop down the interchange would defenatly give the dynamic breaks a good work-out and risk stringlining the train. They would defenatly need to re-grade the trackage for any train, especially closing Main Street for that kind of work and good luck with the city of Ann Arbor to approve closing that road for a project like that.
"...and I was in the front and Matt grabbed and pulled my ears from behind me and made horsey sounds."

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11451
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by J T »

As long as I can remember, I've always wanted to see a train on that interchange track. Maybe some day...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

User avatar
JANGAJONGA
Epic Fail B34 Master
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:35 pm

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by JANGAJONGA »

Chrisracer8903 wrote:
ns8401 wrote:There won't be any interchange between the AA and the GDLK via AA any time soon, the interchange needs major work to handle any trains let alone through freights.
Also, the interchange is a VERY steep grade (Gotta be atleast 4% maybe?) and goes through a very narrow right-of-way of woods and across Main Street (A 4-lane highway) with minimal visibility from the trees and the AA bridge. The tracks are still in place and the switches both on NS and AA's side are still in-tact (according to Bing Maps), but the tracks have trees growing between the rails, rails are missing in some segments, and Main Street is mostly paved over the rails.

The grade could be very challenging (and somewhat dangerous) to run an actual through-freight off that interchange track. A large train taking the grade north of Huron Street, then to make that steep, curved drop down the interchange would defenatly give the dynamic breaks a good work-out and risk stringlining the train. They would defenatly need to re-grade the trackage for any train, especially closing Main Street for that kind of work and good luck with the city of Ann Arbor to approve closing that road for a project like that.
The switch on the Ann Arbor has been gone for a few years, as well as the track from the Ann Arbor is torn up.

User avatar
Ypsi
The Bestest Railroadfan... fan
Posts: 5513
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Ypsi »

Image
LANSING, Mich. – Passengers riding Amtrak trains over the 80-miles of 110-mph trackage in Michigan and Indiana will be offered complimentary cake and beverages tomorrow to celebrate the first anniversary of higher speed service. Amtrak and the Michigan Department of Transportation also are gearing up for track improvements along the former Norfolk Southern route used by Amtrak’s Wolverine Service and Blue Water trains from Kalamazoo to Central and Eastern Michigan. Amtrak will assume responsibility for the trackage effective Feb. 16.

In December the Michigan Department of Transportation used a grant from the Federal Railroad Administration to purchase of 135 miles NS track for $140 million. The line is connected to the Amtrak-owned Michigan District, which runs 97 miles from Kalamazoo to Porter, Ind. With the acquisition of the NS track, nearly 80 percent of the route between Detroit and Chicago is publically owned and will be maintained for passenger trains at higher speeds.

The goal is to expand the 110 mph top speeds for Amtrak trains from the current 80 miles, starting eastward with the 22-mile segment between Kalamazoo and Battle Creek. Travel times will be reduced as more improvements are made. Last year, Amtrak shaved about 20 minutes from the 2001 schedules on the Amtrak-owned segment of the corridor and the plan is to further reduce the travel time between Detroit and Chicago to about five hours.

The $140 million used to purchase the line included High-speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program grant funds, plus a state match of $37.5 million. The FRA also awarded $196.5 million to MDOT for major track and signal improvements on the corridor to be performed by Amtrak. NS will transfer dispatching to Amtrak in phases during the next three years. Norfolk Southern will continue to provide freight service over the line.
"Ann Arbor 2373 Calling... Milkshake. Over"

All Aboard Amtrak: Northbound, Southbound, and My Hometown

bctrainfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 am
Location: Battle Creek, MI

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by bctrainfan »

Wonder if this means problems such as malfunctioning crossing gates etc will need to be reported to Amtrak directly, and will NS maintainers still do the actual work, ie, as a contractor?

conrail767596
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:01 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by conrail767596 »

NS will not be doing the work, it will be Amtrak. Now stuff will get fixed.
Hoping for a swift transition away from NS Operating Rules on the territory as well.

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10688
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Sounds like Amtrak guys would like to get rid of the old NS guys as soon as possible. Can't say I blame them, I understand the NS guys are referring to the Amtrak guys as "scabs" and all that wonderful stuff, and are stuck in their old and admittedly lazy ways. As said above, hopefully now stuff will actually get fixed. I understand the NS guys are mad that their company sold the line but hey man, stuff happens. Move on.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
Ypsi
The Bestest Railroadfan... fan
Posts: 5513
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Ypsi »

Living on the line, I will say that the 25 mph summer sucked! and the NS guys didnt seem to do anything about it fast. Just glad that Amtrak will keep the speeds up becasue they will care about the on time precentage better. I will say that NS had done a pretty good job distpatching the amtrak trains at least between wayne and jackson. The amtrak trains generally get to go infront of the NS 38 or 39Es when they need to meet, and they do the best they can meeting the amtrak trains between Wayne and Jackson.
"Ann Arbor 2373 Calling... Milkshake. Over"

All Aboard Amtrak: Northbound, Southbound, and My Hometown

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by ns8401 »

YpsiAmtrakBoy wrote:Living on the line, I will say that the 25 mph summer sucked! and the NS guys didnt seem to do anything about it fast. Just glad that Amtrak will keep the speeds up becasue they will care about the on time precentage better. I will say that NS had done a pretty good job distpatching the amtrak trains at least between wayne and jackson. The amtrak trains generally get to go infront of the NS 38 or 39Es when they need to meet, and they do the best they can meeting the amtrak trains between Wayne and Jackson.
It's better than it was, but they still aren't doing as efficient a job as they could. I remember once hearing a local waiting at CP Ypsi to run around their train and go east. Amtrak was out at lake with his stop at Ann Arbor ahead and the dispatcher held the local up even though he would have made it the short distance to Wayne and been out of the way in time. That and the rusty rail rules that were put in place a few years ago seem to do more to slow things down than anything.
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

User avatar
12Bridge
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:57 pm
Location: Lake Wazapamani

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by 12Bridge »

[quote="YpsiAmtrakBoy"...and the NS guys didnt seem to do anything about it fast. ..[/quote]

Nor should they. They should not have to spend countless dollars so Amtrak can benefit from 100mph track when all they need is 25 for there business.

bctrainfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 am
Location: Battle Creek, MI

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by bctrainfan »

Well, you can't blame the NS guys for being unhappy with the situation. And you can't blame the slow orders, etc, on the NS maintainers and MOW people, that was more of a political jousting match between the higher powers at NS and Amtrak. :roll:

Good luck to any of the NS people effected by the changes, hope things work out for the better for them!

Notch 8
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:43 am

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Notch 8 »

NS always looked at ROI, However Amtrak's business model is completely different then the NS business model. 100mph trains are not new either the Pennsy was doing this 80 years ago ! What is the actual weekly passenger count for this line ? Good business on NS part, sell the line but retain freight rights to the line, Genius !

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15463
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Saturnalia »

bctrainfan wrote: Good luck to any of the NS people effected by the changes, hope things work out for the better for them!
I wonder if Amtrak will hire some of them, as they know the line & it's quirks. Like it has already been said, the maintenance issues were probably a higher-power issue than the "boots on the ground".
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by CSX_CO »

MQT3001 wrote:
bctrainfan wrote: Good luck to any of the NS people effected by the changes, hope things work out for the better for them!
I wonder if Amtrak will hire some of them, as they know the line & it's quirks. Like it has already been said, the maintenance issues were probably a higher-power issue than the "boots on the ground".
I bet most of them will have enough seniority to bump to other positions in the area. Unless they want to give up all their seniority and start over at AMTRAK. Having knowledge of something doesn't mean you'll be in a position to get the job you want.

Practice Safe CSX

Super Chief
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Three Rivers, Mi.--Indian Rocks Beach,Fl.

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by Super Chief »

Checked the line out today coming from VA in Battle Creek, lots of new ties at various spots around Galesburg. I assume the old searchlight signals will be coming down with new ones as in Lawton replacing them?

bctrainfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 am
Location: Battle Creek, MI

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by bctrainfan »

Noticed Amtrak MOW pickups parked at NS Hinman yard (Battle Creek) instead of the usual NS truck thats has been there before.

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by JStryker722 »

Well given that I live in Dearborn Heights just down the street from the now completely Amtrak line,it's going to be interesting to see an Amtrak crossing sign on my street's crossing instead of NS.who needs the NE corridor to see long stretches of Amtrak owned track,I got it in my backyard here! Although idk how wise it is to run 110mph in non-grade separated track in the Detroit Metro area will be with more crossings per 1/2 mile than on the whole NE corridor.
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10688
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: NS, AMTK, MDOT & FRA Transfer Title of Michigan Line

Unread post by SD80MAC »

JStryker722 wrote:Well given that I live in Dearborn Heights just down the street from the now completely Amtrak line,it's going to be interesting to see an Amtrak crossing sign on my street's crossing instead of NS.who needs the NE corridor to see long stretches of Amtrak owned track,I got it in my backyard here! Although idk how wise it is to run 110mph in non-grade separated track in the Detroit Metro area will be with more crossings per 1/2 mile than on the whole NE corridor.
I'm sure it won't be 110 in that area.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

Post Reply