Packard Plant Rail Service

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
azimmer
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:11 pm

Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by azimmer »

A group of developers has purchased the old Packard Plant on Detroit's east side. The plans are to produce modular homes and offices on the site:

http://www.freep.com/article/20131028/B ... l-Van-Horn

Norfolk Southern operates two branch lines on the east side, and one of those lines is directly adjacent to the site. Currently, the only customer on that line is a produce distributor that is located just south of the old Packard Plant

Can anyone provide more information or speculation on how this new operation, if it comes to fruition, will change rail operations in Detroit? There is some talk that new rail lines will be constructed to deliver finished goods to a port on the Detroit River.

ConrailDetr​oit
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 5988
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by ConrailDetr​oit »

That is on Conrails Beltline extension, not NS. Even though all we have seen is the Conrail crew using an NS engine.

There are a few customers north of the plant. Soon to be GM Poletown, Strong steel and a warehouse that receives boxcars next to the Parade Company warehouse on Huber.

Stinger4me
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:37 am
Location: In Michigan

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by Stinger4me »

There was a time when the Conrail tracks went south to Jefferson and underneath Jefferson. I think the tracks provided service to the former U.S. Royal(later Uniroyal) and may have headed west south of Jefferson Ave. perhaps close to and making connection with the GTW near the Brush St. Depot. The hooligans in Motown loved to break into boxcars and help themselves to new tires.

azimmer
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by azimmer »

milineamtrak wrote:That is on Conrails Beltline extension ...
There are a few customers north of the plant. Soon to be GM Poletown ...
It's hard to remember that Conrail is still in business with all the NS locos prowling around the area.

But GM Poletown is not linked to the Beltline. It is serviced from the nearby Conrail and CN lines that run directly from North/East yard. (For CN it would be the Mt. Clemens sub.)

Those crews that work the Beltline have to traverse some of the worst urban territory in the country. I'd hate to be in their place.

KenB
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1503
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:43 pm
Location: Dearborn, Mich.

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by KenB »

The GM Poletown plant was switched by GTW-CN. CN lost the contract to CR-DSAA so CN pulled the switch leading into the plants yard which was bult with State money. So Conrail-DSAA has to relay the track on the orginal Belt Line (again with State money) to acces the yard.

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 38618
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by AARR »

A switching short line tried to get the contract to switch Poletown and interchange with CR crossing CN tracks. I guess the state determined rebuilding the line for direct access to CR was the most economical way to go .
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
M.D.Bentley
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Downriver

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by M.D.Bentley »

The state of Michigan has nothing to do with who switches the Poletown plant. YES it was built with state funds ( just like Mack yard.). The reason CN quit switching the BOC was when GM went into bankruptcy, a lot of suppliers/creditors got burnt. The CN was using it for storage but GM told them to pay rent or get out. They got out and took their switch with them. There are 7 customers on the Beltline Extension , some get rail service some don't at this time. The Beltline use to go to the river at one time and there seemed to be a yard every block or two. AND yes you could smell the rubber ( thats how they knew which cars had tires in them ). AND CONRAIL IS STILL ALIVE !

PatAzo
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1371
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:20 pm

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by PatAzo »

Some of the inbound materials by rail. Outbound I'd expect truck movements. If the finished product is to big to truck across town to the port it's to big to be economical to ship by sea. They say modular but I suspect pre-fabricated kits if they figure to ship any distance.

Call me a Doubting Thomas. $6M to buy 35 acres of abandoned collapsing buildings so unsafe the fire department won't go in most of them when they are on fire. In 1998-99 the city and state were going to demolish the site and estimated it at $5M. That's $11M plus to get 35 acres to build on. Why not go an hours or so down the road and get 35 acres of vacant land to build on?

User avatar
astrofunk76
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Lansing, MI

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by astrofunk76 »

Um...yeah. These "buyers" are actually living in another galaxy somewhere. Their nonsensical "statement" from yesterday includes talk of "prophecy," Albert Einstein and "Hernando Deesoto" [sic]. Interesting reading: http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C42144731029.PDF

If that $6 million check arrives, I'll eat my hat.

Next up, from what I understand, are some Peruvians who bid $2 million. Can't wait to find out what their story is...

azimmer
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by azimmer »

astrofunk76 wrote:Um...yeah. These "buyers" are actually living in another galaxy somewhere. Their nonsensical "statement" from yesterday includes talk of "prophecy," Albert Einstein and "Hernando Deesoto" [sic].
Not to mention "Hyland Park (sic)."

It seems that everyone has been deceived by a pack of crazies, yet no one wants to admit the farce because the prospect of $6 million has them all hypnotized.

I was at first surprised at the claim that 6000 jobs would be created at the site. GM Poletown, a much larger oeration just a short distance north, only employs about 1500. But now there comes this insane babble in the form of an official statement. Something is very wrong somewhere.

The newspapers should investigate this Dr. Jill van Horn.

It looks like the Beltline won't be revitalized after all.

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1816
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

PatAzo wrote:Why not go an hours or so down the road and get 35 acres of vacant land to build on?
As Mr. Rogers would say "Can you say Enterprise Zone?"

User avatar
Norm
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:03 am
Location: Waterford, MI

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by Norm »

Well, like any other plan in a severely depressed and dilapidated area of any inner city, I'll believe the intentions of the purchaser when I see the finished product. I don't think the Packard Plant is coming down anytime soon.
Norm

PatAzo
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1371
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:20 pm

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by PatAzo »

Standard Railfan wrote:As Mr. Rogers would say "Can you say Enterprise Zone?"
With a viable business plan you don't need that site to get an enterprise zone or tax breaks. A clear site for $6M is comparable to what vacant industrial land in a city setting sells for. At $11M, real manufacturers are looking at what is available somewhere else.

My take is it's the age old real estate churn. Drum up some interest in a project and take your cut off the top.

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1816
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

The most recent news indicates that there will be no rail service needed at the former Packard plant. :(

The high bid was rejected owing to the bidder not submitting the required deposit in a timely fashion.

The second place bidder is a Chicago based developer, William Hults. According to the Detroit Free Press " Hults says he intends to proceed with his vision to redevelop the auto factory on the city’s east side into a mixed-use residential, commercial and entertainment complex."

More on the story here http://www.freep.com/article/20131101/B ... -Palazuelo

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Packard Plant Rail Service

Unread post by hoborich »

Not to rain on the parade, but the old Packard plant, being a former auto plant, almost certainly would be a brownfield, and require millions for environmental cleanup. Haven't seen any mention of that...............yet.Developers always exagerate their plans and job creation by a factor of 10.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

Post Reply