Page 1 of 2

GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:28 am
by A No.1
These new GLC engines,

Are EMD GP38-2's?


Any one know?

Where are they getting shipped from?

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:36 am
by AARR
GP38-2's
Rebuilt in Pudach?
Ex-leasing co.
Exx-UP
Nee-MP (built 1973ish)

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:37 am
by GLC 392
They are GP38-2's ex-UP's i believe. They are coming from Puducah KY from the ex-VMV shops which is now NRE.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:53 am
by Mr. Tops
That reminds me...I saw them (2 of them, I think) coming north around Kanakee on CNIC on my way up to MI for the holidays on 12-23 around 1600. Here's an awesome cell phone grab shot of 395 while driving north on I-57. My photography skills are digressing...

Image

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:01 pm
by AARR
And the truck has a similiar color scheme as GLC unit. You couldn't have set that up better than what you caught by chance on the fly :) I think it's a great pic.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:02 pm
by ¶aragraph
GLC395 battle creek at 1:51am 12/25
GLC396 battle Creek at 23:40 12/23
glc 397 at Paducah KY 12/20
glc 398 Fulton KY on 12/22
GLC 399 battle creek at 1:51am 12/25

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:24 pm
by A No.1
I did't Know abut 397 or 98

Here's 396 Yesterday.

Image

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:45 pm
by A No.1
Here is one more from Christmas Eve.



http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 505&nseq=0


Thank you for the info guys.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:20 pm
by Y@
Mr. Tops wrote:That reminds me...I saw them (2 of them, I think) coming north around Kanakee on CNIC on my way up to MI for the holidays on 12-23 around 1600. Here's an awesome cell phone grab shot of 395 while driving north on I-57. My photography skills are digressing...

Image
Now that's truly an inspirational photo. Thank you Bob, PCA vote on RP from me!!!

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:02 pm
by A No.1
Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.

BTW, This is GLC 395 & 399.

Image

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 7:38 pm
by J T
JUST AARON wrote:Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.
Are there some buildings missing in the background? Something about that angle looks odd to me.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 8:43 pm
by Buster Manning
The transload doesn't seem to transload anymore........or were you referring to the roundhouse that used to sit in the background from WAAAYYYYY back??

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:31 pm
by A No.1
J T wrote:
JUST AARON wrote:Train 332 in Battle Creek, Tied down at Emmett Street. Stan brought her in last night.
Are there some buildings missing in the background? Something about that angle looks odd to me.
The shot I usually take looks off the bridge to the South West. This was shot looking to the South East. Right into the sun if the clouds were not there. The Peoples LLC grain Co op is directly to camera right. They still use the grain elevator, But not with trains.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 7:40 am
by J T
Yeah, I've taken a pic in that direction before. It just seems like there should be more buildings or something in the background. Maybe I'm imagining something else.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:10 am
by DLM
Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:00 am
by jukeman45
JUST AARON wrote:Here is one more from Christmas Eve.



http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 505&nseq=0


Thank you for the info guys.
Is the last CN unit in that row one of the former BNSF units?

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:02 am
by Mr. Tops
DLM wrote:Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?
Typical 2600 gallon tank for a GP38-2. A 3600 gallon tank would completely fill the space between the trucks. Some railroads opted for the 2600 gal, others opted for the 3600 gal...the same goes for GP40-2s. So, to answer your question, no it is not smaller than normal. You may just be used to seeing a 2600 gallon tank on a 56 ft GP35, while the 2600 gal tank on a 59 ft GP38-2 tends to look smaller, although its actually the same size, but the locomotive is longer.

And yes...that is CN 2141 4th back, ex-BNSF C40-8W...

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:43 am
by AARR
Mr. Tops wrote:
DLM wrote:Is it my imagination or do these new GLC locomotives smaller fuel tanks than normal?
Typical 2600 gallon tank for a GP38-2. A 3600 gallon tank would completely fill the space between the trucks. Some railroads opted for the 2600 gal, others opted for the 3600 gal...the same goes for GP40-2s. So, to answer your question, no it is not smaller than normal. You may just be used to seeing a 2600 gallon tank on a 56 ft GP35, while the 2600 gal tank on a 59 ft GP38-2 tends to look smaller, although its actually the same size, but the locomotive is longer.

And yes...that is CN 2141 4th back, ex-BNSF C40-8W...
I've also seen a few 38's and 39's with smaller tanks than the 2600 gal.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:08 pm
by Mr. Tops
AARR wrote:I've also seen a few 38's and 39's with smaller tanks than the 2600 gal.
http://www.trainweb.org/csxphotos/photo ... SX-yn3.jpg

CSX GP38-2s 2556-2559 (ex-Durham & Southern) had 1700 gallon tanks. 56, 58 and 59 still have them, while 2557 now has a 3600 gallon tank. Other smaller railroads are similar.

Re: GLC 395, 396, 399

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:13 pm
by Raildudes dad
I wouldn't want to pay for a "fillup" on any of them :lol: