GLC 385

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.
Contact:

GLC 385

Unread post by GLC 392 »

GLC 385 is finally back on the road after a year and a half of being out of service. The engine was repainted from its original GLC all blue with white stripes to the current blue and white. The engines head light was also moved from the nose to the cab.

Notch 8
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:43 am

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by Notch 8 »

No Pictures ? You said you had connections...... What other work was done ? Did they do the work or sent out ? Good to see it made it made it back to service and not razor blades.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38457
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by AARR »

GLC 392 wrote:The engines head light was also moved from the nose to the cab.
Would you happen to know why it was moved?
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

MSchwiebert
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1611
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:43 pm
Location: Perrysburg Ohio

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by MSchwiebert »

There's been issues with crews getting burned by the headlights when they are in the nose.

bctrainfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 am
Location: Battle Creek, MI

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by bctrainfan »

MSchwiebert wrote:There's been issues with crews getting burned by the headlights when they are in the nose.
That strikes me funny cuz when I read that it was moved, I had formed kind of a short list of possible reasons why in my untrained railfan head, none of which were even close to the real world practical explanation! :lol:

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15419
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by Saturnalia »

bctrainfan wrote:
MSchwiebert wrote:There's been issues with crews getting burned by the headlights when they are in the nose.
That strikes me funny cuz when I read that it was moved, I had formed kind of a short list of possible reasons why in my untrained railfan head, none of which were even close to the real world practical explanation! :lol:
I was thinking maybe they had to find a new nose, and the one they got didn't have a light, so they went up top with it...
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10585
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Crews probably realized how nice it was having the cab headlights on the GP38-2s and decided to move 385s while it was being rebuilt.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

bctrainfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 3:29 am
Location: Battle Creek, MI

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by bctrainfan »

But that does bring up a good question....which is preferred by the crew, headlight on the nose or on the top of the cab?

User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by GLC 392 »

I have seen pictures but, I can not share them. It looks pretty good but I will always like the Annie look on the 35's now looks like a normal 35 minus the trucks.

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11413
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by J T »

I think I'm going to create the forum name "GLC 385" and then start a thread about GLC 392. :wink:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4142
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by CAT345C »

I've got lots of photos of 392 I can share JT!

Nose head lights have a higher risk of blowing out when you hit snow drifts.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
BerkshireKid
sofa king we todd
Posts: 1539
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:22 pm

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by BerkshireKid »

Dont know the reasoning but I can find out when I talk to pops this weekend. He sent me a picture from when it came out of the shop. Not the greatest but it'll do til someone gets a better picture.
[url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/4160 ... .jpg[/img]
Untitled by peremarquette1225, on Flickr[/url]

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by CSX_CO »

I'd go with crew members getting burned as the reason for the move followed closely by the snow issue.

I preferred lights on the nose. High headlights just seemed to illuminate to top of the nose.

Practice Safe CSX

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38457
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by AARR »

CSX_CO wrote:I'd go with crew members getting burned as the reason for the move followed closely by the snow issue.

I preferred lights on the nose. High headlights just seemed to illuminate to top of the nose.

Practice Safe CSX
I've heard that nose lights illuminate more effectively than cab mounted lights so I was curious why the move. It never occurred to me the nose light could burn someone...ouch.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by TSB »

What keeps the crew from burning their little hands in the cab?
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

glc395
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by glc395 »

Your all wrong, its easier for the electrician to work on it there, something to do with the wiring. Anybody that gets burned from standing in front of a headlight an idiot and deserves it, myself I prefer the headlight it the nose, better visibility, and in the winter you can warm your face up on it real quick

User avatar
~Z~
Sofa King Admin
Posts: 13033
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by ~Z~ »

Wonder what kind of wattage the bulbs for the headlights use? Switch to some LEDs :)
Webmaster
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by JStryker722 »

~Z~ wrote:Wonder what kind of wattage the bulbs for the headlights use? Switch to some LEDs :)
Isn't the new Amtrak electrics getting LED lights?
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

GreatLakesRailfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 4830
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Marysville, Michigan

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by GreatLakesRailfan »

Thanks for sharing your pop's photo, Dane. It's good enough to see what they did (and it looks like they did a pretty nice job).
~ Charles W.

User avatar
Ypsi
The Bestest Railroadfan... fan
Posts: 5511
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: GLC 385

Unread post by Ypsi »

JStryker722 wrote: Aren't the new Amtrak electrics getting LED lights?
The one's that have been delivered/ compleated do have LEDs. In the photo below you can see how it's got a blue hue to the light, and in the ditch lights you can see the bulbs.

http://ppcdn.500px.org/45550302/0bc363b ... 982e/4.jpg
glc395 wrote: Anybody that gets burned from standing in front of a headlight an idiot and deserves it
I would think that it would be pretty easy to brush up against a headlight when just walking across the porch for some reason, especially if you have a grip in one hand, maybe something else bulky in the other, and if there's snow making the walk slippery.. so many things could happen where one would bump into/ rub against the nose and get burned by a headlight by mistake while they are caring out operations safely. Not a [img]whole[/img] lot of room on a walk between the nose and handrails.. calling them an idiot is a little harsh, but that's just my opinion on the matter.

And yes thanks Dane for the photo. Looks good freshly painted too, at least on the nose 8)
"Ann Arbor 2373 Calling... Milkshake. Over"

All Aboard Amtrak: Northbound, Southbound, and My Hometown

Post Reply