YUMA Sand Closing

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
Bob1
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:42 am

YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Bob1 »

I herd the tracks will be torn up between yuma and cadillac.

Mike H
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: Vicksburg, Michigan
Contact:

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Mike H »

Little late for an April fools joke. That kind of thing wouldn't just happen overnight even if that was true..

Mike H

User avatar
astrovanman1989
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 522
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:08 pm
Location: saginaw mi

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by astrovanman1989 »

i heard it to they might be closing from a relaible source
member of the
Soo Line historical society
DSS&A historical society
http://www.youtube.com/user/tricityrailfan

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10639
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by SD80MAC »

I have also heard the owners of the mine will be shutting it down soon. That being said, I haven't heard anything about the tracks being abandoned. GLC will lose about 20-30 cars a week once the mine is closed.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
cfriedri
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 5:13 pm
Location: Janesville, WI, USA

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by cfriedri »

Edit: Question no longer relevant
Last edited by cfriedri on Sat Aug 22, 2015 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Connor

User avatar
Jochs
Iron Horse Whisperer
Posts: 7318
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: On my laptop!

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Jochs »

There is really nothing between Yuma and Cadillac, except a siding at Boon, which usually has cars stored in it.
This is from 5/10/15, in Boon.
boon2.jpg
Jeff O.
Celebrating 11 years dial-up free!

(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 38732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by AARR »

Back when they were using 70 ton covered hoppers Yuma would ship 20-30 car blocks of sand, 4-5x per week. Most of that went to the Ford casting plants in Cleveland.

In the early 90's 100 ton cars became the norm and number of carloads dropped but not overall tonnage. Mr. TSB tells a story of the first time they delivered the bigger cars for loading with a message to the pit managers they could only fill them part ways up otherwise they would overload them. The first 17 cars were filled to the top and the cars broke in half.

It's decline started around 2007 when the Ford casting plants in Cleveland started closing or reducing sand usage. By around 2010 almost all sand to Cleveland stopped.

Yuma still has a couple good years (2012, 2013) shipping frac sand but with the opening of better grades of frac sand pits in IL and WI Yuma's importance quickly fell again.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

GP-35
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:31 pm

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by GP-35 »

Sand plant my be closing, but the new feed mixing place in the old Delta Truss building when up & running will recieve 25 car cut of feed twice a week. That will pick up where the sand left off, Also the new track for the power plant is under con. right now in Mcbain, grade is done & the ties are being spread out on the new grade. Also Lafarge & Holcim Cement have merged, the deal was final July 20. The Federal Trade Commission made Lafarge & Holcim sell off some cement plant & termanals to there competeters to break up the monopeley. you can Goggle the sale & read more about it. The Elmira terminal was included, the new onwner is Buzzi Cement, Elmira will switch to rail in the spring of 2016, 20 to 40 cars a week, the cement will be coming from one of there seven plants the owne. GLC will have plenty of work!!

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 38732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by AARR »

GLC has a relatively new sales man (couple years now?) who has developed five or six new customers north of Clare in the last few years. The old railroad ties is particularly good business with up to 2000 cars a year anticipated (that's 40 a week so we'll see if it's that many or not). Merritt Energy is reportedly shipping 40-60 cars a month (10-15 a week) from the gas plant south of Kalkaska. The other new customers do not ship as many carloads but are still nice to have.

GP35 has connections and is a reliable source but until I see the business I'm a little skeptical that those projections at this time are optimistic sales outlooks :wink: I won't be disappointed if I'm wrong, though :)
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

Raildudes dad
Roadmaster
Posts: 4761
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:12 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Raildudes dad »

Given the drop on the price of oil it wouldn't surprise me that frac sand traffic drops to virtually nothing. IIRC, Yuma traffic got really slow in 2007/8 when the automotive was in the toilet. There also appears to be a drop in sand traffic from the new transload at Fuller in GR.

User avatar
Jochs
Iron Horse Whisperer
Posts: 7318
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: On my laptop!

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Jochs »

Raildudes dad wrote:Given the drop on the price of oil it wouldn't surprise me that frac sand traffic drops to virtually nothing. IIRC, Yuma traffic got really slow in 2007/8 when the automotive was in the toilet. There also appears to be a drop in sand traffic from the new transload at Fuller in GR.
Also a side-note...last time I was down by Bridgman at Livingston Rd. a few weeks ago, (Livingston on CSX) it appeared Technisand was abandoned.
Jeff O.
Celebrating 11 years dial-up free!

(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 38732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by AARR »

I think Fairmount Minerals, the company that owned Yuma Sand, also owned Technisand.
Jochs wrote:Also a side-note...last time I was down by Bridgman at Livingston Rd. a few weeks ago, (Livingston on CSX) it appeared Technisand was abandoned.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

TC Man
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:25 am

It's already closed

Unread post by TC Man »

Drove by there just a bit ago. It's certainly already closed up. Stopped at the little gas station near Harrietta, and clerk said last week they let everyone go except a few to finish getting equipment ready to become dormant and ship out the tractors.

And I highly doubt the tracks will suddenly be ripped out (and Bob1, you HEARD, not HERD). Look at the Grawn branch- 6 years plus since the last train and it's still in place. Yuma line is perfect for car storage (very few NIMBY's), and you never know what could go in the sand mine in the future.
CEO of the Waving Institute- teaching great wave forms.

Notch 8
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:43 am

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Notch 8 »

Any reason given why the sand facility closed in Yuma ? I guess my question if it has not been mined out completely is there a possibility of someone else taking this facility and shipping in the future ?

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4145
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by CAT345C »

The price of Crude is below the threshold for fracking to be cost effective. The entire industry is down right now. Good thing so many shortlines those gut Frac sand was their saving grace.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 38732
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by AARR »

Yuma was also shipping casting sand which the volume has dropped significantly since 2006-07 when Ford changed their molding processes. They used to ship up to 65 cars a week (it was more than that in the days when they used 70 ton cars) of casting sand to Ford in Cleveland alone. Just before shutting down I think they were shipping maybe 20-30 or so cars a week of casting sand...just a guess.
CAT345C wrote:The price of Crude is below the threshold for fracking to be cost effective. The entire industry is down right now. Good thing so many shortlines those gut Frac sand was their saving grace.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15437
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Could be seeing a ton of drillers and sand producers dying in the next year...plenty are barely holding on. Crude will probably stay low, too, since they're about to lift sanctions on Iran so more oil will flow from there.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

Notch 8
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:43 am

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by Notch 8 »

So really, cheap oil is not good for the economy... Crap I believe is getting ready to hit the Fan !

User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
Posts: 2737
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.
Contact:

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by GLC 392 »

Also Fairmount Materials owns plants in Wi and MN that are much more efficient and are also newer with higher output capabilities. I don't see this being the end of the line. Here a few years ago the railroad invested a lot of Money into the siding and main at Yuma. I see someone trying to buy that place, may not be right away but i see someone taking it over.

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11436
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: YUMA Sand Closing

Unread post by J T »

Notch 8 wrote:So really, cheap oil is not good for the economy... Crap I believe is getting ready to hit the Fan !
Cheap oil = cheap gas = more spending money in the pockets of consumers = good for the economy.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

Post Reply