Page 1 of 1

Another BNSF wreck video

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:29 pm
by i995impalass
this might have been posted before but....

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FGhNp1iovss&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FGhNp1iovss&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

I would like to know who keeps getting these incab BNSF wrecks

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:03 pm
by SteveTJ
Ouch! Hopefully the crew wasn't hurt.

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:00 pm
by RailCanon
Here's an explanation of this particular wreck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivRu-1AU ... re=related

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:59 pm
by J T
Did they REALLY need to have a good 2:30 of nothing included at the beginning of this video? The last BNSF head on crash video was the same way. I wish these people would learn to edit.

Anyway...WOW to that crash. :shock:
Gregg Pullano wrote:Here's an explanation of this particular wreck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivRu-1AU ... re=related
Gregg, can you explain why at :20 of that video it says that being held up by the hotbox detector saved their lives? They still crashed...so what is the person who made that video implying, that the crash would have been worse? How so?

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:13 pm
by odave
There was a comment from the author that said that if the train were not held up, they'd be going faster (49mph) instead of 36mph

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:40 pm
by J T
odave wrote:There was a comment from the author that said that if the train were not held up, they'd be going faster (49mph) instead of 36mph
Thanks, I missed that. But who knows...the could have been injured less at 13mph faster. You never know.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:09 pm
by i995impalass
To me it looks like the derail was back on, why the switch wasent lined back for the main is beyond me, but that wreck from what I am told and the one on the NS that killed someone due to a tanker derailing is why the FRA has come out with the the new rule that will hold crews responsable for the alignment of switches

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:59 pm
by J T
Chris, as far as crews being held responsible, if a wreck DOES occur and someone is killed, does the person (or persons) who were responsible for a switch being misaligned face manslaughter charges? That could get really ugly.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:33 pm
by i995impalass
I belive they can be, I also know if a proper air test isent done and a train hits a car at a crossing and the people get hurt or killed the person that did the air test can be held responsable

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:48 am
by TrainNut85
I think someone forgot to close the switch to the siding. My guess, it had to have been the last crew that worked that siding. I hope nobody was hurt, cuz that accident looked serious from when the train hit the hopper car.

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:32 am
by BNSF 1088
Thank god i don't work DTC where i am at that is such a pain in the butt where i work it is TWC ABS.