Why 39ft Rails?

Any historical questions can be posted here. Answers would certainly help as well :)
User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15462
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Why was the standard rail length set at 39ft?
:?
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

csxt4617
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 728
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:21 pm

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by csxt4617 »

So they'll fit on a 40' car.

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1822
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

Why a 40ft car? So they would hold a 39ft rail? :?

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15462
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by Saturnalia »

csxt4617 wrote:So they'll fit on a 40' car.
Why didn't I think of that? :oops: :lol:

As for why 40ft, my guess is it was a nice round number, and is easy to work with just about everywhere on today's and yesterday's rail system (Maybe wood came in 10ft sections :wink: )
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by CSX_CO »

MQT3001 wrote: As for why 40ft, my guess is it was a nice round number, and is easy to work with just about everywhere on today's and yesterday's rail system (Maybe wood came in 10ft sections :wink: )
Except now, I'd wager the 'average' freight car length is 55' to 60'. Rare to find anything exactly 40' anymore. Even the 'smaller' corn syrup cars (that cube out at weight at their small size) are a bit over 40' from coupler to coupler.

40' was probably the most economical size when almost *everything* went via rail, and every town had its own team track, industries, etc. Smaller shippers didn't need the larger sized cars, so it would be a waste of materials and space to have 60' cars. As more centralized distribution became more common, larger capacity cars serving fewer customers made more sense. Also, as heavier axle loadings became possible through the advancements in suspension and metallurgy, the 40' cars fell by the wayside as you could get more 'stuff' into the larger car before you maxed out the weight.

Practice Safe CSX

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15462
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by Saturnalia »

CSX_CO wrote:
MQT3001 wrote: As for why 40ft, my guess is it was a nice round number, and is easy to work with just about everywhere on today's and yesterday's rail system (Maybe wood came in 10ft sections :wink: )
Except now, I'd wager the 'average' freight car length is 55' to 60'. Rare to find anything exactly 40' anymore. Even the 'smaller' corn syrup cars (that cube out at weight at their small size) are a bit over 40' from coupler to coupler.

40' was probably the most economical size when almost *everything* went via rail, and every town had its own team track, industries, etc. Smaller shippers didn't need the larger sized cars, so it would be a waste of materials and space to have 60' cars. As more centralized distribution became more common, larger capacity cars serving fewer customers made more sense. Also, as heavier axle loadings became possible through the advancements in suspension and metallurgy, the 40' cars fell by the wayside as you could get more 'stuff' into the larger car before you maxed out the weight.

Practice Safe CSX
Thanks for another of your fantastic explainations CSX CO :D
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by CAT345C »

Are you sure? I've seen a lot of 33' foot pieces out there too! On the length of car note, a lot of the class ones are getting rid of the 50' box cars and going to the 60' box car.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 39007
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by AARR »

CAT345C wrote:a lot of the class ones are getting rid of the 50' box cars and going to the 60' box car.
I too am seeing a growing number of companies that traditionally received 50' box cars starting to receive 60's. Primarily newsprint and paper customers.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
MP73point4
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:24 pm
Location: Billtown, MI

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by MP73point4 »

CAT345C wrote:Are you sure? I've seen a lot of 33' foot pieces out there too! On the length of car note, a lot of the class ones are getting rid of the 50' box cars and going to the 60' box car.
These may have started out as 39 foot sections and had the ends cut off due to damage or cracking where the holes were drilled. Cut off the damaged area, drill new holes, presto! - 33 foot lengths of relay rail.
RR Pass Collector

MSchwiebert
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1611
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:43 pm
Location: Perrysburg Ohio

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by MSchwiebert »

For new rail, 78 foot strings seems to be a common length, however the SDI mill near Columbia City Indiana can produce 240 foot strings.
http://www.stld-cci.com/pdf/Metal_Cente ... rticle.pdf

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by CAT345C »

My personal favorites are the 6 bolt bars with 2 bolts on one rail, then one piece on the two middle bolts, and finally the last two bolts on the other piece of rail! And yes I have modeled that on the model railroad as well! I've seen the 33' sections the most in sidings and yard tracks so you are most likely right. Too much batter and stress caused them to cut the rail back to 33'. Never thought you could have too much batter!
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

i995impalass
Yooper Foamer
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:00 am
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Why 39ft Rails?

Unread post by i995impalass »

AARR wrote:
CAT345C wrote:a lot of the class ones are getting rid of the 50' box cars and going to the 60' box car.
I too am seeing a growing number of companies that traditionally received 50' box cars starting to receive 60's. Primarily newsprint and paper customers.
Most the 50' boxes are geting to the end of their life. CSX has been re-habbing and putting them into the TTX pool only to buy a few more years.

Post Reply