Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
User avatar
KVERBERK
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 581
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:55 am
Location: Da U.P.

Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by KVERBERK »

No details,but sounds like there were no injuries. I tried to put a link to 9&10 but could not get it to work.
Up North TSBY/GLC Fan

User avatar
cnw8835
Grain Train Fetish LOLZ
Posts: 4736
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by cnw8835 »

Looks like 385 is very definently derailed...

http://www.9and10news.com/story/1974700 ... h-boardman

bnsfben
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:03 am

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by bnsfben »

I wonder if they will scrap 385 on site? Hard to tell if the frame is bent from this picture. I don't think GLC is currently looking to do a major rebuild on a GP35.

firemedic54
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:10 am
Location: Holly, MI.

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by firemedic54 »

Looks like a big ol' grain mess....

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by CAT345C »

I'm watching the clean up now. Elmer's brought in a big crane they are tryin to pule the 395 north off the crossing. Petersons towing out of Cadalac is here taking care of the wood hip truck they plowed. Look for pictures when I get back to ludington.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
Posts: 2741
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:00 pm
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by GLC 392 »

Ben they have a couple 35's down right now so they can part out 385 and get the others working, from the pictures i have seen the engine didnt look to bad, a little front damage more then anything but then you have to look at the trucks and the fuel tank.

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10699
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Was anyone hurt? The article didn't really say. Looks like the crew would've been ok judging from the way the engine came to rest, probably a wild ride though!
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15465
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by Saturnalia »

How fast do they go through there? Takes a lot of energy to make a Geep do THAT :shock:
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

SD80MAC wrote:Was anyone hurt? The article didn't really say. Looks like the crew would've been ok judging from the way the engine came to rest, probably a wild ride though!
The news clip in the link says everyone walked away.

Buster Manning
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by Buster Manning »

MQT3001 wrote:How fast do they go through there? Takes a lot of energy to make a Geep do THAT


Having walked away from something VERY similar, not really. Figure the engine climbed up just enough upon impact to have the flanges clear the rail and voila!!!, you have an engine going where that fickle fiend Momemtum wants it to go

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by CAT345C »

Here are the photos that I took today. I stayed out of the way. I was surprised there must have been 50 other people sitting in the cars watching with me.

When I arrived they had already pulled the 2 cars north.
Image
IMG_8841 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Judging by the short distance 385 went I would put a guess that they were not traveling to fast maybe around 20-25. Any faster I would think physics would have started to play and 385 would have rolled.
Image
IMG_8843 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8844 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Engineers side
Image
IMG_8845 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8846 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8847 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Removing the chips from the trailer and scene.
Image
IMG_8848 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8850 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8853 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8854 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8860 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8861 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Image
IMG_8862 by miketabone89, on Flickr
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
KVERBERK
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 581
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:55 am
Location: Da U.P.

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by KVERBERK »

Nice pictures
Last edited by KVERBERK on Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Up North TSBY/GLC Fan

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15465
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Buster Manning wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:How fast do they go through there? Takes a lot of energy to make a Geep do THAT


Having walked away from something VERY similar, not really. Figure the engine climbed up just enough upon impact to have the flanges clear the rail and voila!!!, you have an engine going where that fickle fiend Momemtum wants it to go
That does make more sense. I doubt the ride these guys went on was anything even near what you went through earlier this year.

Where on the GLC is this? N/S of Cadillac?
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by CAT345C »

Its north, took me a about a half hour via expressway.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11451
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by J T »

CAT345C wrote:Here are the photos that I took today. I stayed out of the way. I was surprised there must have been 50 other people sitting in the cars watching with me.
Did RJ Corman bring their Hulchers? :wink:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by CAT345C »

No RJ Corman did not bring their hulchers...... :shock: I'm sure it was prolly faster for them to get Elmers out there with the crane rather than get Hulchers or RJ up here from Chicago or Toledo. It was prolly cheaper too but I would think insurance covers it.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 11451
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by J T »

CAT345C wrote:No RJ Corman did not bring their hulchers...... :shock: I'm sure it was prolly faster for them to get Elmers out there with the crane rather than get Hulchers or RJ up here from Chicago or Toledo. It was prolly cheaper too but I would think insurance covers it.
You DO understand my post, right? :)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by CAT345C »

J T wrote:
CAT345C wrote:No RJ Corman did not bring their hulchers...... :shock: I'm sure it was prolly faster for them to get Elmers out there with the crane rather than get Hulchers or RJ up here from Chicago or Toledo. It was prolly cheaper too but I would think insurance covers it.
You DO understand my post, right? :)

Yes there were not 572's or 583's around.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
trnwatcher
My name ain't Steven
Posts: 4855
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Grandville MI
Contact:

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by trnwatcher »

Doktor No wrote:One of Newtons Laws of motion is Mass times Speed Squared. Comes into play very much here. Take the weight of the train, multiply it by the speed and square THAT would ya! You come up with some astronomical numbers and thats the reason why at 4 its a coupling at 5 its a collision. The weight curve takes off and goes almost straight up after 5 or 6. Its like the richter scale. Each number is so much greater then the number before it. Sorta like swatting an aluminum beer can with a tennis racket, a baseball bat, a car then swat it with a train.
We're just bugs on the windshield of life man.
geek....;-)
Steven F. Shick
http://www.youtube.com/user/trnwatcher
http://www.trnwatcher.net

I.T. guy/Railfan
"The true railfan has two favorite railroads....the Baltimore & Ohio and another one." - Charles S. Roberts

Tom
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:47 am

Re: Train vs truck. On GLC south board man

Unread post by Tom »

CAT345C wrote: It was prolly cheaper too but I would think insurance covers it.
I can't even imagine what railroads pay for insurance. However, since they are never at fault in grade crossing accidents hopefully this all gets piled on the driver's insurance.

Post Reply