Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
- Larry G
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:58 pm
- Location: Somewhere between the Wye!
Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2012 ... S-S-Badger
See link above for the possible end of the ship as an institution at Ludington. Disturbing
Storm cancelled the sailing today and for Halloween. Th and F, November 1st and 2nd might be the last chance to take a voyage.
See link above for the possible end of the ship as an institution at Ludington. Disturbing
Storm cancelled the sailing today and for Halloween. Th and F, November 1st and 2nd might be the last chance to take a voyage.
"If I Harp at you, it is only to Spur you on!
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15451
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
That kind of crap should be unacceptable. Some politicians declare they are for every job, yet support the ravenous "Environmental Protection Agency", who time and time and time again uses their power to shut down whatever they want whenever they want. If you want to count coal ash, go to Europe.That put the Lake Michigan Carferry Service squarely in the EPA's crosshairs, with the agency essentially saying: "Fix the problem by 2013, or be put out of business."
500 tons? Give me a break. Those lakes are so darned heavy they depress the earth's crust. Go look at five loaded coal cars, then try to tell me how putting those in the Great Lakes would do any major harm. Hey, those wind turbines are going to replace coal-fired plants like Campbell and Cobb?
-
- RedNeck Train Chaser
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
- Location: Buffalo Location
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
You do realize the lakes are there because of holes left by glaciers right?MQT3001 wrote:That kind of crap should be unacceptable. Some politicians declare they are for every job, yet support the ravenous "Environmental Protection Agency", who time and time and time again uses their power to shut down whatever they want whenever they want. If you want to count coal ash, go to Europe.That put the Lake Michigan Carferry Service squarely in the EPA's crosshairs, with the agency essentially saying: "Fix the problem by 2013, or be put out of business."
500 tons? Give me a break. Those lakes are so darned heavy they depress the earth's crust. Go look at five loaded coal cars, then try to tell me how putting those in the Great Lakes would do any major harm. Hey, those wind turbines are going to replace coal-fired plants like Campbell and Cobb?
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
He knows everything, Mike.CAT345C wrote:You do realize the lakes are there because of holes left by glaciers right?
Bottom text.
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAY@ wrote:He knows everything, Mike.CAT345C wrote:You do realize the lakes are there because of holes left by glaciers right?
I'm just here to put in time claims and complain
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
"What I meant to say..."Y@ wrote:He knows everything, Mike.CAT345C wrote:You do realize the lakes are there because of holes left by glaciers right?
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15451
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
Could someone point out where I said the lakes were created by something other than glaciers? Or maybe where I mentioned the creation of them at all?
You can't, because I never did.
I spoke of the weight of the water depressing the earth's crust. Not to be confused with glacial depression, which had the same effect (to a greater extent however), plus the carving out of the lakes.
You can't, because I never did.
I spoke of the weight of the water depressing the earth's crust. Not to be confused with glacial depression, which had the same effect (to a greater extent however), plus the carving out of the lakes.
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
No, I can't do any of that, because I flat out do not care.MQT3001 wrote:Could someone point out where I said the lakes were created by something other than glaciers? Or maybe where I mentioned the creation of them at all?
You can't, because I never did.
I spoke of the weight of the water depressing the earth's crust. Not to be confused with glacial depression, which had the same effect (to a greater extent however), plus the carving out of the lakes.
Bottom text.
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
500 tons a year, over how many years though.MQT3001 wrote:500 tons? Give me a break.
Just out of curiosity, would it be plausible to keep the ash on board, and just unload it on shore instead of dumping it into the lake?
Practice Safe CSX
- MagnumForce
- Angry Man
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:48 pm
- Location: Tri State Area
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
This is something I don't understand either, what is the reason the ash has to be dumped in the lake? From what I have been told the stuff is high in heavy metals and heavy metals are hell on the environment even in small amounts, especially in regards to the food chain.
-
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:00 am
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
Why not just convert it to an oil, gas, or propane burner? Let's face it, efficiency is not real high on the list since it is still burning coal. Wouldn't it be better to modify it so it can still exist and operate instead of turning it into a stationary museum or whatever the outcome would be?
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15451
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
They want to, but they aren't ready to convert yet, as they still need to work out the logisitcs. That's why they need ad extension, and are going through this junk with the EPA.kelvindex1 wrote:Why not just convert it to an oil, gas, or propane burner? Let's face it, efficiency is not real high on the list since it is still burning coal. Wouldn't it be better to modify it so it can still exist and operate instead of turning it into a stationary museum or whatever the outcome would be?
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
Because that makes too much sense. However, oil or gas would still lead to polluting our air and causing global warming, so the EPA would likely be against that as well. Then again, all those vehicles on the roads driving around the southern tip of Lake Michigan would also dump pollution into the air. It's a no-win situation and we're all going to die!!kelvindex1 wrote:Why not just convert it to an oil, gas, or propane burner? Let's face it, efficiency is not real high on the list since it is still burning coal. Wouldn't it be better to modify it so it can still exist and operate instead of turning it into a stationary museum or whatever the outcome would be?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.
-
- RedNeck Train Chaser
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
- Location: Buffalo Location
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
About darn time somebody explains it in english!J T wrote: Because that makes too much sense. However, oil or gas would still lead to polluting our air and causing global warming, so the EPA would likely be against that as well. Then again, all those vehicles on the roads driving around the southern tip of Lake Michigan would also dump pollution into the air. It's a no-win situation and we're all going to die!!
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
At first, I was outraged. But with all the dieselized 1000 footers on the lakes, it shouldn't be too difficult to dieselize a 400 footer. Looks like they just don't want to spend the money. A lot of old steam powered lakers have been dieselized, and are still sailing.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".
- Jetlink
- Not a Railfan
- Posts: 3599
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:41 pm
- Location: 2.5 miles from CH 116.3
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
I think coal is cheap per btu (relative to alternatives) and the engines work just fine and very reliably on coal the way they are. While possible any type of conversion, on board ash storage, associated logistics changes, and cost of other fuels would increase the cost of operating the boat by both certain and unknown margins. The Lake Michigan Car ferry is a for profit venture that makes money. Increased and unknown costs put that profitability in jeopardy and therefore also put the future operation of the Badger at risk. There is another for profit car ferry across the lake that probably would like to see less competition. I would imagine the other ferry's management has the ear of a few politicians and also people of influence at the epa. I think this summarizes quite well what is actually going on. So yes there are alternatives. That probably isn't really what this is all about. The questions Really are: At what cost? If not now then when, if ever?
interested in trains
Patiently waiting for LansingRailfan to antagonize me in his tagline
Patiently waiting for LansingRailfan to antagonize me in his tagline
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
As usual, things usually aren't what they appear.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".
-
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:55 pm
- Location: Chicago / South Bend / Berrien County
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
Replacing those engines is a multi-million dollar task. It would make sense if the boat was paid to move year-round, but it's a lot harder to pay for out of future ticket revenues when you only run 3-4 months/year as a tourist ferry.
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
I'm not taking sides here. I know it would be expensive. But the Badger is a private, for profit company. And most of the lakers have been dieselized, and are making a profit. True, their season is longer, but not year around. The Badger has extended their season this year, basically hauling freight [wind turbine parts]. Perhaps the Badger could extend their season every year, and find other sources of freight and revenue, before and after the tourist season. Perhaps a little effort in that direction would be better than the alternative of taking it out of service and scrapping it. Hauling semi trailers or containers across the lake might be worth exploring, since it originally hauled railcars.
This is just an observation, but they seem to be relying on their historic status to make a profit operating just three or four months a year. Maybe they need to change with the times.
This is just an observation, but they seem to be relying on their historic status to make a profit operating just three or four months a year. Maybe they need to change with the times.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".
- Saturnalia
- Authority on Cat
- Posts: 15451
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
- Location: Michigan City, IN
- Contact:
Re: Is former railroad ferry Badger finished?
The Badger operates on a similar schedule to the ferry out of Muskegon. They have 1 round-trip in the spring and fall, and 2 in the summer.
Perhaps someone at the EPA should run the math and see the Badger's environmental footprint is nearly or completely made up by saving autos the trip around the lake. Oh yeah, and those wind turbines: those replace coal eventually, so the Badger's environmental score becomes even better. If they hadn't shipping those parts by sea, imagine them going by truck through/around Chicago
Perhaps someone at the EPA should run the math and see the Badger's environmental footprint is nearly or completely made up by saving autos the trip around the lake. Oh yeah, and those wind turbines: those replace coal eventually, so the Badger's environmental score becomes even better. If they hadn't shipping those parts by sea, imagine them going by truck through/around Chicago