New Unit for MMRR

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
sd70accsxt700
Sofa King follower
Posts: 6159
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Toledo, OH.

New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by sd70accsxt700 »

KRR 3803 is acording to a post on Loco Notes, comming to the MMRR. Suposed to move BNSF-CSX Chicago-MMRR Paines
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38512
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by AARR »

From the number I guess its a GP38 or 38-2. Looking forward to learninbg its heritage.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

penn central
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by penn central »

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/pictur ... E%20OK.JPG There she is im guessing GP35M. Just like the 2052 on the SBS it looks like. Cool.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38512
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by AARR »

penn central wrote:http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/pictur ... E%20OK.JPG There she is im guessing GP35M. Just like the 2052 on the SBS it looks like. Cool.
Ok, a 35 rebuilt to 38 specs. Nice looking engines :)
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
cnw8835
Grain Train Fetish LOLZ
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by cnw8835 »

Looks like its probably in Chicago by now. By Streator, IL 2 days ago with the KRR 3801 as well...
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPi ... id=2716513

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10605
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Sweet! A new engine for me to go and track down. :)
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

HSO 1307
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:02 pm

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by HSO 1307 »

Just in time for the upcoming harvest season? With the MAC expansion I would asume big 90 car grain trains.

User avatar
Racer
Stops in Oncoming Traffic
Posts: 4365
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by Racer »

That's a pretty cool unit and the paint scheme is unique, too. I assume MMRR will not be needing to borrow HESR power anymore?
"...and I was in the front and Matt grabbed and pulled my ears from behind me and made horsey sounds."

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10605
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by SD80MAC »

These are GP38M's. Another unit, 3801, is heading for the MMRR in Muskegon, and might've even gone up on Z627 last night.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
MP73point4
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:24 pm
Location: Billtown, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by MP73point4 »

Tomato, Tomatoe, Potato, Potatoe. GP35M or GP38M may both be correct. They were originally GP35 carbodies, so GP35M (Modified) could be considered correct. They are apparrently rebuilt to GP38 standards, so GP38M could also be correct. If they have -2 or -3 electricals then that could be added as well. Once rebuilt, the designations for units can get a little fuzzy. There seems to be enough inconsistency in these designations by railroad rebuilders and independent rebuilders to provide lots of fodder for this kind of conversation.
RR Pass Collector

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by ns8401 »

According to what I can find they are GP35M units:

KRR 3801 = S/N 29810, 2/1965, Built as MP 630 / MP 2008 / MP 2600

KRR 3803 = S/N 28785, 8/1964, Built as Texas & Pacific 613 (!) / MP 2513 / MP 2607
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

TrainWatcher
The Beast
Posts: 5934
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:28 pm

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by TrainWatcher »

T&P? Wow, thats a suprise.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38512
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by AARR »

TrainWatcher wrote:T&P? Wow, thats a suprise.
I do not know all the legalities but even though it says T&P they always had MP reporting markings IIRC
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by ns8401 »

T&P was majority MP controlled starting in 1929 but was not merged into MP until 1976. These were delivered with MP buzzsaw logos but TP lettering in the buzzsaw. Later they were integrated more formally into MP's fleet. MMRR is getting both of these units.
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38512
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by AARR »

ns8401 wrote:T&P was majority MP controlled starting in 1929 but was not merged into MP until 1976. MMRR is getting both of these units.
So did they originally have T&P reporting markings?
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by ns8401 »

AARR wrote:
ns8401 wrote:T&P was majority MP controlled starting in 1929 but was not merged into MP until 1976. MMRR is getting both of these units.
So did they originally have T&P reporting markings?
Yes.
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10605
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by SD80MAC »

IIRC the way the Texas laws were for many years was that a railroad that didn't originate in Texas couldn't build into Texas or something along those lines. That's why you had companies like Missouri Pacific with the International Great Northern (in Texas) and the Southern Pacific with the Texas & New Orleans (in Texas). T&P also fell into this fold after MP bought them. I'm not sure about T&P, but IGN and T&NO were technically seperate railroads but were operated as parts of the overall MoPAC and SP systems.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3988
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI
Contact:

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by ns8401 »

Thats correct Jon, from what I was reading the government organized the railroads (giving them land and such) they were independent companies but once they were majority controlled by another railroad they were operated as a part of the larger system albeit with slightly different paint and road name...
Celebrating Over 3800 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
NS8401, Online, At Trackside And On Your Side

User avatar
Jochs
Iron Horse Whisperer
Posts: 7306
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: On my laptop!

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by Jochs »

KRR 3801, KRR 3803 on Q326-16 through St. Joseph around midnight on 9/17/11. Look for it in GR on Saturday morning :)
Jeff O.
Celebrating 11 years dial-up free!

(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1

User avatar
Hugh
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:49 am

Re: New Unit for MMRR

Unread post by Hugh »

Do I understand correctly, this unit is going to Muskegon? Is it as a replacement or an addation to whats already there.

Post Reply